Tech Council
Consulting
Cloud readiness assessment: checklist and best practices
How to assess company readiness for cloud migration. Covers infrastructure evaluation, application analysis, costs, security, and team skills.

Halina Haydinger
Strategic Marketing Manager, Streamlogic
Nov 17, 2025

Reading time: 10 minutes
Table of Contents
Why run a cloud readiness assessment?
What does the assessment cover?
How to conduct cloud readiness assessment
Cloud readiness assessment checklist
Migration approaches for workloads
Tools that support assessment
What you get from the assessment
Common mistakes in cloud migration
Best practices for your assessment
Introduction
Global spending on public cloud services reached $723.4 billion in 2025, according to Gartner. Precedence Research estimates the overall cloud computing market at $912.77 billion, projecting growth to $5.15 trillion by 2034. This growth pattern shows how companies gain cost efficiency, innovation speed, and better business outcomes through cloud adoption.
A cloud readiness assessment is a structured review that evaluates your organization's technical and operational preparedness for cloud migration. The process inventories your current environment, tests application compatibility, evaluates security controls, and measures team capabilities through discovery tools, interviews, and analysis.
The resulting document classifies each system by migration approach (rehost, refactor, replace), assigns priority based on business value and technical complexity, estimates resource requirements, and maps dependencies between components. This information shapes realistic timelines, accurate budgets, and practical migration plans that your teams can execute with confidence.
Why run a cloud readiness assessment?

Many companies approach cloud migration as a straightforward hosting change. They assume virtual machines will simply move from one data center to another. This view misses technical dependencies, regulatory requirements, and operational adjustments that determine whether migration succeeds or fails.
Cloud readiness assessment manages technical and operational risk by identifying constraints before they become problems. Teams discover tight integrations between systems, legacy platforms that need updates, and regulatory limitations that affect data placement. Early visibility prevents unplanned downtime during migration and reduces the chance of rolling back failed moves.
The assessment also links cloud plans to concrete business goals. You determine which systems deliver the most value when modernized and which applications support requirements for faster feature delivery, better availability, or improved customer experience. Migration efforts can then focus on workloads that matter most to business outcomes.
Cost planning becomes more accurate when you understand current total ownership versus expected cloud spending. The assessment reveals where cloud use makes financial sense and where it might not. You avoid surprises in monthly bills and can forecast expenses with reasonable precision.
Assessment replaces ad-hoc migrations with a structured plan. Instead of moving systems one at a time without coordination, teams follow a sequence of clearly defined steps. Different groups align around shared priorities and timing, which reduces confusion and prevents resource conflicts.
What does the assessment cover?

Cloud readiness assessment examines six interconnected areas that determine migration success.
Business perspective captures why you're considering cloud adoption. You document specific needs like cost reduction, flexibility improvements, or reliability requirements. The assessment evaluates application criticality for each system and defines acceptable recovery time if problems occur. Business factors guide technical decisions throughout the migration process.
Applications and architecture reviews the types of software you run. Monolithic applications behave differently from microservices or packaged solutions. The assessment maps dependencies including shared databases, message queues, APIs, and batch jobs. You learn which applications fit cloud patterns naturally and which need architectural changes before they can move.
Infrastructure and operations analyzes your current data centers, virtualization platforms, network topology, and storage solutions. The assessment examines how teams monitor systems, collect logs, perform backups, and recover from failures. It measures automation level by comparing manual scripting against Infrastructure as Code and CI/CD pipelines. Operational practices often need adjustment for cloud environments.
Security, compliance and data protection classifies data by sensitivity. Personal information, financial records, and confidential business data receive different handling. The assessment identifies regulations that apply to your industry and geography. You review current practices for identity management, access control, encryption, and security monitoring. Cloud deployments must meet necessary standards from day one.
People and skills evaluates team experience with cloud platforms, containers, orchestration tools, and DevOps practices. The assessment identifies whether you have cloud architects, security specialists, and site reliability engineers available. It measures team readiness to adopt new responsibilities and working methods. This human element often determines how quickly migration can proceed.
Processes and operating model examine how your company handles change management, incident response, and problem resolution. The assessment reviews release practices, testing approaches, and deployment frequency. It looks at how IT groups cooperate with business units and product teams. Strong processes smooth the transition while weak ones create friction.
How to conduct cloud readiness assessment
6 phases structure successful assessments:
Preparation and scoping begins by formulating the main questions your company needs answered. You identify stakeholders from IT, business, security, finance, and operations. The scoping exercise defines which applications, regions, or business units fall within assessment boundaries. Clear scope prevents wasted effort on systems that won't move soon.
Discovery and inventory creates a comprehensive list of applications, services, servers, and integrations. Teams collect existing architecture diagrams and operational data. Discovery tools detect systems and dependencies that documentation misses or forgets. A factual foundation gets built for all later analysis.
Assessment and analysis evaluates each application along several dimensions. Technical fit and complexity determine how easily systems can move. Business importance guides prioritization decisions. Data sensitivity and compliance requirements affect deployment options. Operational readiness and team skills influence timing. Applications get grouped into high, medium, or low readiness categories based on these factors.
Choosing migration approaches assigns a specific strategy to each system. Some applications move as-is with minimal changes. Others need platform adjustments or deeper redesign. Certain systems get replaced with SaaS products. Legacy applications might be decommissioned entirely. Applications get ordered into migration waves that respect dependencies and manage risk. Prerequisite work like upgrades, refactoring, or network changes gets identified.
Estimating costs and risks calculates cloud resource needs using historical usage data. The analysis includes one-time costs for re-engineering work, new tools, training programs, and external support. It lists technical, regulatory, and organizational risks with potential mitigations for each. This financial picture supports budget requests and business case development.
Building the roadmap summarizes overall readiness level and major blockers or enablers. It describes the intended future landscape at a high level. The roadmap outlines a step-by-step migration plan with indicative timing and milestones. Execution teams use this deliverable as their reference document through implementation.
The table below summarizes the assessment phases, their key activities, and expected outcomes:
Phase | Key Activities | Deliverable |
Preparation and scoping | Formulate main questions, identify stakeholders from IT/business/security/finance, define scope boundaries | Scope document with assessment objectives |
Discovery and inventory | List applications/services/servers, collect architecture diagrams, use discovery tools for undocumented systems | Complete inventory of IT assets |
Assessment and analysis | Evaluate technical fit and complexity, assess business importance, check data sensitivity, review operational readiness | Application classifications by readiness level |
Choosing migration approaches | Assign strategy per system (move/redesign/replace), order into migration waves, identify prerequisite work | Migration approach matrix |
Estimating costs and risks | Calculate cloud resource needs, include one-time costs, list technical/regulatory/organizational risks | Financial projections and risk register |
Building the roadmap | Summarize readiness level, describe future landscape, outline step-by-step plan with timing | Migration roadmap with milestones |
Cloud readiness assessment checklist
Use this checklist to evaluate your organization's preparation for cloud migration. Each item should be reviewed and documented before proceeding with your transition.
Category | Assessment Item | What to Evaluate |
Business alignment | Migration objectives | Document specific goals: cost reduction targets, scalability requirements, innovation timeline |
Application criticality | Rate each system by business impact and acceptable downtime | |
Success metrics | Define measurable KPIs for migration success | |
Infrastructure | Current environment inventory | List all servers, storage systems, network equipment, and virtualization platforms |
Network bandwidth | Measure current usage and assess capacity for data transfer | |
Hardware compatibility | Identify systems that cannot move to cloud | |
Applications | Application dependencies | Map connections between systems, databases, APIs, and services |
Architecture patterns | Classify as monolithic, microservices, or legacy | |
Performance baselines | Document current response times, throughput, and resource usage | |
Technical debt | Identify outdated frameworks, unsupported platforms, code quality issues | |
Data | Data volume and growth | Calculate total data size and projected growth rates |
Data classification | Categorize by sensitivity: public, internal, confidential, restricted | |
Data residency requirements | Identify geographic or jurisdictional constraints | |
Backup and recovery needs | Define RPO (Recovery Point Objective) and RTO (Recovery Time Objective) | |
Security & compliance | Current security posture | Review firewalls, access controls, encryption, monitoring tools |
Regulatory requirements | List applicable regulations: GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, industry-specific standards | |
Identity and access management | Evaluate current IAM systems and cloud compatibility | |
Compliance gaps | Identify areas where current practices fall short of cloud requirements | |
Team & skills | Cloud expertise | Assess team experience with AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, or other platforms |
DevOps capabilities | Evaluate knowledge of CI/CD, Infrastructure as Code, containers | |
Training needs | Identify skill gaps and required certifications | |
Resource availability | Determine if internal teams can handle migration or external help is needed | |
Operations | Monitoring and logging | Review current tools and cloud migration compatibility |
Incident management | Document current processes and required adaptations | |
Change management | Assess organizational readiness for new workflows | |
Automation level | Measure current scripting vs Infrastructure as Code adoption | |
Costs | Current IT spending | Calculate total cost of ownership for on-premises infrastructure |
Cloud cost estimates | Project monthly and annual cloud expenses by workload | |
Hidden costs | Account for data transfer, storage, licensing, training, and support | |
Financial model | Compare CapEx vs OpEx and determine budget allocation | |
Risk assessment | Technical risks | List potential integration issues, performance problems, data loss scenarios |
Business risks | Identify downtime impact, customer experience issues, revenue effects | |
Mitigation strategies | Document contingency plans for each identified risk |
This checklist provides a systematic framework for your cloud readiness assessment. Review each item with relevant stakeholders and document findings to build your migration strategy.
Migration approaches for workloads
Cloud readiness assessment results determine which migration approach fits each workload.
Move with minimal changes (often called rehost or lift-and-shift) transfers applications to cloud infrastructure without significant modifications. Systems move quickly but capture limited cloud benefits. This works well for applications that run fine as-is and don't need immediate modernization.
Adjust platform or configuration (replatform) makes limited changes to take advantage of cloud features. You might switch databases to managed services or add auto-scaling. Speed gets balanced with benefit capture in this middle path.
Re-architect for cloud involves substantial redesign to use cloud-native patterns. Applications become more modular, resilient, and efficient. More time and resources get required but maximum long-term value gets delivered.
Replace with SaaS swaps custom applications for commercial software-as-a-service products. The maintenance burden gets eliminated entirely. This works when available SaaS products meet your needs adequately.
Retire unused systems removes applications that no longer serve business purposes. Assessment often reveals forgotten systems consuming resources without delivering value. Decommissioning frees budget and attention.
Keep on-premises temporarily delays migration for systems with special constraints. Technical limitations, regulatory requirements, or interdependencies might justify waiting. The assessment documents these cases clearly so they don't get forgotten.
Assessment results guide these choices by rating each application's cloud fit, business value, complexity, and risk. Guesswork gets replaced with informed decisions about which systems move when and how.
The table below summarizes migration approaches and their optimal use cases:
Migration Approach | When to Use |
Move with minimal changes (Rehost) | Applications run fine as-is and don't need immediate modernization. Quick migration needed with limited cloud benefits. |
Adjust platform (Replatform) | Want to capture some cloud features like managed databases or auto-scaling while balancing speed with benefits. |
Re-architect for cloud | Need maximum long-term value. Applications should become more modular, resilient, and efficient. More time and resources available. |
Replace with SaaS | Available SaaS products meet your needs adequately. Want to eliminate the maintenance burden entirely. |
Retire unused systems | Systems no longer serve business purposes. Consuming resources without delivering value. |
Keep on-premises temporarily | Technical limitations, regulatory requirements, or interdependencies justify waiting. Special constraints exist. |
Tools that support assessment
Several categories of tools accelerate cloud readiness assessment.
Inventory and discovery tools automatically collect information about servers, services, ports, and network traffic. They map communication flows between components. Manual effort gets reduced substantially and hidden or forgotten systems get surfaced. Automated discovery provides more complete and accurate data than interviews alone.
Application analysis tools scan code and configuration files for outdated frameworks, unsupported platforms, or security issues. They highlight modules that present greater migration difficulty. Manual review gets supplemented with objective measurements of application health and modernization requirements.
Cost estimation tools use actual resource usage data to size target cloud instances and services. They produce rough cost estimates for different deployment scenarios. While projections require adjustment based on detailed design, they provide useful ranges for budget planning and business case development.
Reporting and visualization tools present assessment results as tables, diagrams, and dependency maps. Good reporting makes findings accessible to both technical and non-technical audiences. Clear visuals help stakeholders understand complexity and make informed decisions about priorities and timing.
Surveys and workshop materials gather input from development, operations, security, and business teams. Structured questionnaires capture expectations, constraints, and perceived risks efficiently. Workshops complement automated discovery by adding context about how systems actually get used and maintained.
Most environments benefit from combining multiple tool types to build a complete picture. The right mix depends on environment size, available time, and team familiarity with assessment practices. Working with experienced cloud consulting services helps select appropriate tools and interpret results effectively.
What you get from the cloud readiness assessment

A thorough cloud readiness assessment produces several key deliverables.
Application portfolio with classifications catalogs each system with its business role, suggested migration approach, complexity rating, and risk level. The portfolio assigns priority in the migration sequence based on dependencies and value. Planning and execution reference this structured inventory.
High-level target architecture shows how applications and data could arrange in the cloud. It identifies shared services like networking, identity management, logging, and backup infrastructure. The architecture positions on-premises, hybrid, and multi-cloud elements where relevant. Detailed design work follows this blueprint.
Migration roadmap describes which applications move in each phase. It maps dependencies between steps and defines key checkpoints like pilot completion or environment validation. The phased plan includes indicative timing for each wave. Teams coordinate work and communicate progress to stakeholders using this timeline.
Operating model recommendations suggest changes in roles, responsibilities, and collaboration patterns. The assessment proposes initial rules for access control, resource tagging, monitoring practices, and cost management. Teams adapt to cloud-native ways of working through these operational guidelines.
Skills development plan identifies knowledge gaps in architecture, operations, security, and development practices. It recommends specific training programs, certification paths, or hiring needs. Some companies engage remote senior software engineers and dedicated development teams to supplement internal capabilities during transition periods.
Assessment findings transform into actionable guidance through these deliverables. Teams move from "should we migrate" to "here's exactly how we'll do it" with confidence grounded in data.
Common mistakes in cloud migration
Several patterns frequently undermine cloud migration efforts. The following table outlines common mistakes and practical prevention strategies:
Mistake | How to Prevent |
Seeing cloud only as new hosting | Review architecture and processes, not just infrastructure. Rethink how systems work, not just where they run. |
Insufficient attention to people and processes | Plan operational changes alongside technical ones. Avoid maintaining old deployment practices in new environments. |
Incomplete inventory and hidden dependencies | Use thorough discovery tools. Document all services, scripts, and integrations before migration. |
Late security and compliance involvement | Include legal and security experts from the beginning. Make them part of initial design decisions. |
Weak cost visibility and control | Establish clear ownership for cloud spending. Implement cloud cost estimation practices before migration starts. |
Attempting large "all at once" migration | Use an incremental migration approach. Learn from early phases and adjust methods based on experience. |
Best practices for your cloud readiness assessment
Effective cloud readiness assessments follow several principles:
Make goals and success criteria explicit. Write down what decisions the assessment should support and how you'll measure success. Align expectations between IT leaders, business stakeholders, and finance teams before work begins. Clarity prevents disagreements about scope and deliverables later.
Include all relevant functions from the start. Involve representatives from IT, security, compliance, finance, and business units in planning discussions. Agree upfront on how to rank applications and how to balance competing concerns about risk, cost, and value. Cross-functional input produces more realistic and acceptable outcomes.
Combine automated discovery with expert review. Use tools to gather factual data about systems and infrastructure. Validate and enrich findings through interviews and workshops with people who build and maintain the systems. Automation provides breadth while human insight adds necessary context.
Work iteratively. Start with a subset of systems or a pilot domain. Test assessment methods, scoring approaches, and prioritization frameworks on this limited scope. Adjust based on what you learn before expanding to the full environment. Quality improves and stakeholder confidence builds through this approach.
Connect assessment results to broader plans. Link findings to ongoing modernization efforts, product roadmaps, and organizational initiatives. Companies that treat cloud readiness assessment as a recurring activity rather than a one-time project maintain better alignment as environments evolve.
Conclusion

Cloud readiness assessment prepares companies for migration, but several factors need attention after the initial review. Data migration becomes more complex than anticipated. Moving large data volumes, converting formats, and validating results need separate planning from application moves.
Hybrid cloud fits when some workloads stay on-premises because of regulations, technical limits, or costs. The optimal setup often mixes cloud and on-premises infrastructure instead of moving everything.
Assessment can't be done once and forgotten. Environments change, applications get added, business needs shift. Regular reassessment keeps cloud strategy current with company direction. The first evaluation sets a baseline, ongoing reviews improve results.
Each company follows a different migration path. Regulations, legacy systems, team experience, and business goals vary widely. Standard frameworks give structure but real execution needs expertise matched to your specific setup.
Want to map your migration path? Partner with Streamlogic's cloud team to build an assessment tailored to your infrastructure, compliance requirements, and goals.

Halina Haydinger
Strategic Marketing Manager, Streamlogic
Reading time: 10 minutes
Table of Contents
Why run a cloud readiness assessment?
What does the assessment cover?
How to conduct cloud readiness assessment
Cloud readiness assessment checklist
Migration approaches for workloads
Tools that support assessment
What you get from the assessment
Common mistakes in cloud migration
Best practices for your assessment
Introduction
Global spending on public cloud services reached $723.4 billion in 2025, according to Gartner. Precedence Research estimates the overall cloud computing market at $912.77 billion, projecting growth to $5.15 trillion by 2034. This growth pattern shows how companies gain cost efficiency, innovation speed, and better business outcomes through cloud adoption.
A cloud readiness assessment is a structured review that evaluates your organization's technical and operational preparedness for cloud migration. The process inventories your current environment, tests application compatibility, evaluates security controls, and measures team capabilities through discovery tools, interviews, and analysis.
The resulting document classifies each system by migration approach (rehost, refactor, replace), assigns priority based on business value and technical complexity, estimates resource requirements, and maps dependencies between components. This information shapes realistic timelines, accurate budgets, and practical migration plans that your teams can execute with confidence.
Why run a cloud readiness assessment?

Many companies approach cloud migration as a straightforward hosting change. They assume virtual machines will simply move from one data center to another. This view misses technical dependencies, regulatory requirements, and operational adjustments that determine whether migration succeeds or fails.
Cloud readiness assessment manages technical and operational risk by identifying constraints before they become problems. Teams discover tight integrations between systems, legacy platforms that need updates, and regulatory limitations that affect data placement. Early visibility prevents unplanned downtime during migration and reduces the chance of rolling back failed moves.
The assessment also links cloud plans to concrete business goals. You determine which systems deliver the most value when modernized and which applications support requirements for faster feature delivery, better availability, or improved customer experience. Migration efforts can then focus on workloads that matter most to business outcomes.
Cost planning becomes more accurate when you understand current total ownership versus expected cloud spending. The assessment reveals where cloud use makes financial sense and where it might not. You avoid surprises in monthly bills and can forecast expenses with reasonable precision.
Assessment replaces ad-hoc migrations with a structured plan. Instead of moving systems one at a time without coordination, teams follow a sequence of clearly defined steps. Different groups align around shared priorities and timing, which reduces confusion and prevents resource conflicts.
What does the assessment cover?

Cloud readiness assessment examines six interconnected areas that determine migration success.
Business perspective captures why you're considering cloud adoption. You document specific needs like cost reduction, flexibility improvements, or reliability requirements. The assessment evaluates application criticality for each system and defines acceptable recovery time if problems occur. Business factors guide technical decisions throughout the migration process.
Applications and architecture reviews the types of software you run. Monolithic applications behave differently from microservices or packaged solutions. The assessment maps dependencies including shared databases, message queues, APIs, and batch jobs. You learn which applications fit cloud patterns naturally and which need architectural changes before they can move.
Infrastructure and operations analyzes your current data centers, virtualization platforms, network topology, and storage solutions. The assessment examines how teams monitor systems, collect logs, perform backups, and recover from failures. It measures automation level by comparing manual scripting against Infrastructure as Code and CI/CD pipelines. Operational practices often need adjustment for cloud environments.
Security, compliance and data protection classifies data by sensitivity. Personal information, financial records, and confidential business data receive different handling. The assessment identifies regulations that apply to your industry and geography. You review current practices for identity management, access control, encryption, and security monitoring. Cloud deployments must meet necessary standards from day one.
People and skills evaluates team experience with cloud platforms, containers, orchestration tools, and DevOps practices. The assessment identifies whether you have cloud architects, security specialists, and site reliability engineers available. It measures team readiness to adopt new responsibilities and working methods. This human element often determines how quickly migration can proceed.
Processes and operating model examine how your company handles change management, incident response, and problem resolution. The assessment reviews release practices, testing approaches, and deployment frequency. It looks at how IT groups cooperate with business units and product teams. Strong processes smooth the transition while weak ones create friction.
How to conduct cloud readiness assessment
6 phases structure successful assessments:
Preparation and scoping begins by formulating the main questions your company needs answered. You identify stakeholders from IT, business, security, finance, and operations. The scoping exercise defines which applications, regions, or business units fall within assessment boundaries. Clear scope prevents wasted effort on systems that won't move soon.
Discovery and inventory creates a comprehensive list of applications, services, servers, and integrations. Teams collect existing architecture diagrams and operational data. Discovery tools detect systems and dependencies that documentation misses or forgets. A factual foundation gets built for all later analysis.
Assessment and analysis evaluates each application along several dimensions. Technical fit and complexity determine how easily systems can move. Business importance guides prioritization decisions. Data sensitivity and compliance requirements affect deployment options. Operational readiness and team skills influence timing. Applications get grouped into high, medium, or low readiness categories based on these factors.
Choosing migration approaches assigns a specific strategy to each system. Some applications move as-is with minimal changes. Others need platform adjustments or deeper redesign. Certain systems get replaced with SaaS products. Legacy applications might be decommissioned entirely. Applications get ordered into migration waves that respect dependencies and manage risk. Prerequisite work like upgrades, refactoring, or network changes gets identified.
Estimating costs and risks calculates cloud resource needs using historical usage data. The analysis includes one-time costs for re-engineering work, new tools, training programs, and external support. It lists technical, regulatory, and organizational risks with potential mitigations for each. This financial picture supports budget requests and business case development.
Building the roadmap summarizes overall readiness level and major blockers or enablers. It describes the intended future landscape at a high level. The roadmap outlines a step-by-step migration plan with indicative timing and milestones. Execution teams use this deliverable as their reference document through implementation.
The table below summarizes the assessment phases, their key activities, and expected outcomes:
Phase | Key Activities | Deliverable |
Preparation and scoping | Formulate main questions, identify stakeholders from IT/business/security/finance, define scope boundaries | Scope document with assessment objectives |
Discovery and inventory | List applications/services/servers, collect architecture diagrams, use discovery tools for undocumented systems | Complete inventory of IT assets |
Assessment and analysis | Evaluate technical fit and complexity, assess business importance, check data sensitivity, review operational readiness | Application classifications by readiness level |
Choosing migration approaches | Assign strategy per system (move/redesign/replace), order into migration waves, identify prerequisite work | Migration approach matrix |
Estimating costs and risks | Calculate cloud resource needs, include one-time costs, list technical/regulatory/organizational risks | Financial projections and risk register |
Building the roadmap | Summarize readiness level, describe future landscape, outline step-by-step plan with timing | Migration roadmap with milestones |
Cloud readiness assessment checklist
Use this checklist to evaluate your organization's preparation for cloud migration. Each item should be reviewed and documented before proceeding with your transition.
Category | Assessment Item | What to Evaluate |
Business alignment | Migration objectives | Document specific goals: cost reduction targets, scalability requirements, innovation timeline |
Application criticality | Rate each system by business impact and acceptable downtime | |
Success metrics | Define measurable KPIs for migration success | |
Infrastructure | Current environment inventory | List all servers, storage systems, network equipment, and virtualization platforms |
Network bandwidth | Measure current usage and assess capacity for data transfer | |
Hardware compatibility | Identify systems that cannot move to cloud | |
Applications | Application dependencies | Map connections between systems, databases, APIs, and services |
Architecture patterns | Classify as monolithic, microservices, or legacy | |
Performance baselines | Document current response times, throughput, and resource usage | |
Technical debt | Identify outdated frameworks, unsupported platforms, code quality issues | |
Data | Data volume and growth | Calculate total data size and projected growth rates |
Data classification | Categorize by sensitivity: public, internal, confidential, restricted | |
Data residency requirements | Identify geographic or jurisdictional constraints | |
Backup and recovery needs | Define RPO (Recovery Point Objective) and RTO (Recovery Time Objective) | |
Security & compliance | Current security posture | Review firewalls, access controls, encryption, monitoring tools |
Regulatory requirements | List applicable regulations: GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, industry-specific standards | |
Identity and access management | Evaluate current IAM systems and cloud compatibility | |
Compliance gaps | Identify areas where current practices fall short of cloud requirements | |
Team & skills | Cloud expertise | Assess team experience with AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, or other platforms |
DevOps capabilities | Evaluate knowledge of CI/CD, Infrastructure as Code, containers | |
Training needs | Identify skill gaps and required certifications | |
Resource availability | Determine if internal teams can handle migration or external help is needed | |
Operations | Monitoring and logging | Review current tools and cloud migration compatibility |
Incident management | Document current processes and required adaptations | |
Change management | Assess organizational readiness for new workflows | |
Automation level | Measure current scripting vs Infrastructure as Code adoption | |
Costs | Current IT spending | Calculate total cost of ownership for on-premises infrastructure |
Cloud cost estimates | Project monthly and annual cloud expenses by workload | |
Hidden costs | Account for data transfer, storage, licensing, training, and support | |
Financial model | Compare CapEx vs OpEx and determine budget allocation | |
Risk assessment | Technical risks | List potential integration issues, performance problems, data loss scenarios |
Business risks | Identify downtime impact, customer experience issues, revenue effects | |
Mitigation strategies | Document contingency plans for each identified risk |
This checklist provides a systematic framework for your cloud readiness assessment. Review each item with relevant stakeholders and document findings to build your migration strategy.
Migration approaches for workloads
Cloud readiness assessment results determine which migration approach fits each workload.
Move with minimal changes (often called rehost or lift-and-shift) transfers applications to cloud infrastructure without significant modifications. Systems move quickly but capture limited cloud benefits. This works well for applications that run fine as-is and don't need immediate modernization.
Adjust platform or configuration (replatform) makes limited changes to take advantage of cloud features. You might switch databases to managed services or add auto-scaling. Speed gets balanced with benefit capture in this middle path.
Re-architect for cloud involves substantial redesign to use cloud-native patterns. Applications become more modular, resilient, and efficient. More time and resources get required but maximum long-term value gets delivered.
Replace with SaaS swaps custom applications for commercial software-as-a-service products. The maintenance burden gets eliminated entirely. This works when available SaaS products meet your needs adequately.
Retire unused systems removes applications that no longer serve business purposes. Assessment often reveals forgotten systems consuming resources without delivering value. Decommissioning frees budget and attention.
Keep on-premises temporarily delays migration for systems with special constraints. Technical limitations, regulatory requirements, or interdependencies might justify waiting. The assessment documents these cases clearly so they don't get forgotten.
Assessment results guide these choices by rating each application's cloud fit, business value, complexity, and risk. Guesswork gets replaced with informed decisions about which systems move when and how.
The table below summarizes migration approaches and their optimal use cases:
Migration Approach | When to Use |
Move with minimal changes (Rehost) | Applications run fine as-is and don't need immediate modernization. Quick migration needed with limited cloud benefits. |
Adjust platform (Replatform) | Want to capture some cloud features like managed databases or auto-scaling while balancing speed with benefits. |
Re-architect for cloud | Need maximum long-term value. Applications should become more modular, resilient, and efficient. More time and resources available. |
Replace with SaaS | Available SaaS products meet your needs adequately. Want to eliminate the maintenance burden entirely. |
Retire unused systems | Systems no longer serve business purposes. Consuming resources without delivering value. |
Keep on-premises temporarily | Technical limitations, regulatory requirements, or interdependencies justify waiting. Special constraints exist. |
Tools that support assessment
Several categories of tools accelerate cloud readiness assessment.
Inventory and discovery tools automatically collect information about servers, services, ports, and network traffic. They map communication flows between components. Manual effort gets reduced substantially and hidden or forgotten systems get surfaced. Automated discovery provides more complete and accurate data than interviews alone.
Application analysis tools scan code and configuration files for outdated frameworks, unsupported platforms, or security issues. They highlight modules that present greater migration difficulty. Manual review gets supplemented with objective measurements of application health and modernization requirements.
Cost estimation tools use actual resource usage data to size target cloud instances and services. They produce rough cost estimates for different deployment scenarios. While projections require adjustment based on detailed design, they provide useful ranges for budget planning and business case development.
Reporting and visualization tools present assessment results as tables, diagrams, and dependency maps. Good reporting makes findings accessible to both technical and non-technical audiences. Clear visuals help stakeholders understand complexity and make informed decisions about priorities and timing.
Surveys and workshop materials gather input from development, operations, security, and business teams. Structured questionnaires capture expectations, constraints, and perceived risks efficiently. Workshops complement automated discovery by adding context about how systems actually get used and maintained.
Most environments benefit from combining multiple tool types to build a complete picture. The right mix depends on environment size, available time, and team familiarity with assessment practices. Working with experienced cloud consulting services helps select appropriate tools and interpret results effectively.
What you get from the cloud readiness assessment

A thorough cloud readiness assessment produces several key deliverables.
Application portfolio with classifications catalogs each system with its business role, suggested migration approach, complexity rating, and risk level. The portfolio assigns priority in the migration sequence based on dependencies and value. Planning and execution reference this structured inventory.
High-level target architecture shows how applications and data could arrange in the cloud. It identifies shared services like networking, identity management, logging, and backup infrastructure. The architecture positions on-premises, hybrid, and multi-cloud elements where relevant. Detailed design work follows this blueprint.
Migration roadmap describes which applications move in each phase. It maps dependencies between steps and defines key checkpoints like pilot completion or environment validation. The phased plan includes indicative timing for each wave. Teams coordinate work and communicate progress to stakeholders using this timeline.
Operating model recommendations suggest changes in roles, responsibilities, and collaboration patterns. The assessment proposes initial rules for access control, resource tagging, monitoring practices, and cost management. Teams adapt to cloud-native ways of working through these operational guidelines.
Skills development plan identifies knowledge gaps in architecture, operations, security, and development practices. It recommends specific training programs, certification paths, or hiring needs. Some companies engage remote senior software engineers and dedicated development teams to supplement internal capabilities during transition periods.
Assessment findings transform into actionable guidance through these deliverables. Teams move from "should we migrate" to "here's exactly how we'll do it" with confidence grounded in data.
Common mistakes in cloud migration
Several patterns frequently undermine cloud migration efforts. The following table outlines common mistakes and practical prevention strategies:
Mistake | How to Prevent |
Seeing cloud only as new hosting | Review architecture and processes, not just infrastructure. Rethink how systems work, not just where they run. |
Insufficient attention to people and processes | Plan operational changes alongside technical ones. Avoid maintaining old deployment practices in new environments. |
Incomplete inventory and hidden dependencies | Use thorough discovery tools. Document all services, scripts, and integrations before migration. |
Late security and compliance involvement | Include legal and security experts from the beginning. Make them part of initial design decisions. |
Weak cost visibility and control | Establish clear ownership for cloud spending. Implement cloud cost estimation practices before migration starts. |
Attempting large "all at once" migration | Use an incremental migration approach. Learn from early phases and adjust methods based on experience. |
Best practices for your cloud readiness assessment
Effective cloud readiness assessments follow several principles:
Make goals and success criteria explicit. Write down what decisions the assessment should support and how you'll measure success. Align expectations between IT leaders, business stakeholders, and finance teams before work begins. Clarity prevents disagreements about scope and deliverables later.
Include all relevant functions from the start. Involve representatives from IT, security, compliance, finance, and business units in planning discussions. Agree upfront on how to rank applications and how to balance competing concerns about risk, cost, and value. Cross-functional input produces more realistic and acceptable outcomes.
Combine automated discovery with expert review. Use tools to gather factual data about systems and infrastructure. Validate and enrich findings through interviews and workshops with people who build and maintain the systems. Automation provides breadth while human insight adds necessary context.
Work iteratively. Start with a subset of systems or a pilot domain. Test assessment methods, scoring approaches, and prioritization frameworks on this limited scope. Adjust based on what you learn before expanding to the full environment. Quality improves and stakeholder confidence builds through this approach.
Connect assessment results to broader plans. Link findings to ongoing modernization efforts, product roadmaps, and organizational initiatives. Companies that treat cloud readiness assessment as a recurring activity rather than a one-time project maintain better alignment as environments evolve.
Conclusion

Cloud readiness assessment prepares companies for migration, but several factors need attention after the initial review. Data migration becomes more complex than anticipated. Moving large data volumes, converting formats, and validating results need separate planning from application moves.
Hybrid cloud fits when some workloads stay on-premises because of regulations, technical limits, or costs. The optimal setup often mixes cloud and on-premises infrastructure instead of moving everything.
Assessment can't be done once and forgotten. Environments change, applications get added, business needs shift. Regular reassessment keeps cloud strategy current with company direction. The first evaluation sets a baseline, ongoing reviews improve results.
Each company follows a different migration path. Regulations, legacy systems, team experience, and business goals vary widely. Standard frameworks give structure but real execution needs expertise matched to your specific setup.
Want to map your migration path? Partner with Streamlogic's cloud team to build an assessment tailored to your infrastructure, compliance requirements, and goals.

Halina Haydinger
Strategic Marketing Manager, Streamlogic
Reading time: 10 minutes
Table of Contents
Why run a cloud readiness assessment?
What does the assessment cover?
How to conduct cloud readiness assessment
Cloud readiness assessment checklist
Migration approaches for workloads
Tools that support assessment
What you get from the assessment
Common mistakes in cloud migration
Best practices for your assessment
Introduction
Global spending on public cloud services reached $723.4 billion in 2025, according to Gartner. Precedence Research estimates the overall cloud computing market at $912.77 billion, projecting growth to $5.15 trillion by 2034. This growth pattern shows how companies gain cost efficiency, innovation speed, and better business outcomes through cloud adoption.
A cloud readiness assessment is a structured review that evaluates your organization's technical and operational preparedness for cloud migration. The process inventories your current environment, tests application compatibility, evaluates security controls, and measures team capabilities through discovery tools, interviews, and analysis.
The resulting document classifies each system by migration approach (rehost, refactor, replace), assigns priority based on business value and technical complexity, estimates resource requirements, and maps dependencies between components. This information shapes realistic timelines, accurate budgets, and practical migration plans that your teams can execute with confidence.
Why run a cloud readiness assessment?

Many companies approach cloud migration as a straightforward hosting change. They assume virtual machines will simply move from one data center to another. This view misses technical dependencies, regulatory requirements, and operational adjustments that determine whether migration succeeds or fails.
Cloud readiness assessment manages technical and operational risk by identifying constraints before they become problems. Teams discover tight integrations between systems, legacy platforms that need updates, and regulatory limitations that affect data placement. Early visibility prevents unplanned downtime during migration and reduces the chance of rolling back failed moves.
The assessment also links cloud plans to concrete business goals. You determine which systems deliver the most value when modernized and which applications support requirements for faster feature delivery, better availability, or improved customer experience. Migration efforts can then focus on workloads that matter most to business outcomes.
Cost planning becomes more accurate when you understand current total ownership versus expected cloud spending. The assessment reveals where cloud use makes financial sense and where it might not. You avoid surprises in monthly bills and can forecast expenses with reasonable precision.
Assessment replaces ad-hoc migrations with a structured plan. Instead of moving systems one at a time without coordination, teams follow a sequence of clearly defined steps. Different groups align around shared priorities and timing, which reduces confusion and prevents resource conflicts.
What does the assessment cover?

Cloud readiness assessment examines six interconnected areas that determine migration success.
Business perspective captures why you're considering cloud adoption. You document specific needs like cost reduction, flexibility improvements, or reliability requirements. The assessment evaluates application criticality for each system and defines acceptable recovery time if problems occur. Business factors guide technical decisions throughout the migration process.
Applications and architecture reviews the types of software you run. Monolithic applications behave differently from microservices or packaged solutions. The assessment maps dependencies including shared databases, message queues, APIs, and batch jobs. You learn which applications fit cloud patterns naturally and which need architectural changes before they can move.
Infrastructure and operations analyzes your current data centers, virtualization platforms, network topology, and storage solutions. The assessment examines how teams monitor systems, collect logs, perform backups, and recover from failures. It measures automation level by comparing manual scripting against Infrastructure as Code and CI/CD pipelines. Operational practices often need adjustment for cloud environments.
Security, compliance and data protection classifies data by sensitivity. Personal information, financial records, and confidential business data receive different handling. The assessment identifies regulations that apply to your industry and geography. You review current practices for identity management, access control, encryption, and security monitoring. Cloud deployments must meet necessary standards from day one.
People and skills evaluates team experience with cloud platforms, containers, orchestration tools, and DevOps practices. The assessment identifies whether you have cloud architects, security specialists, and site reliability engineers available. It measures team readiness to adopt new responsibilities and working methods. This human element often determines how quickly migration can proceed.
Processes and operating model examine how your company handles change management, incident response, and problem resolution. The assessment reviews release practices, testing approaches, and deployment frequency. It looks at how IT groups cooperate with business units and product teams. Strong processes smooth the transition while weak ones create friction.
How to conduct cloud readiness assessment
6 phases structure successful assessments:
Preparation and scoping begins by formulating the main questions your company needs answered. You identify stakeholders from IT, business, security, finance, and operations. The scoping exercise defines which applications, regions, or business units fall within assessment boundaries. Clear scope prevents wasted effort on systems that won't move soon.
Discovery and inventory creates a comprehensive list of applications, services, servers, and integrations. Teams collect existing architecture diagrams and operational data. Discovery tools detect systems and dependencies that documentation misses or forgets. A factual foundation gets built for all later analysis.
Assessment and analysis evaluates each application along several dimensions. Technical fit and complexity determine how easily systems can move. Business importance guides prioritization decisions. Data sensitivity and compliance requirements affect deployment options. Operational readiness and team skills influence timing. Applications get grouped into high, medium, or low readiness categories based on these factors.
Choosing migration approaches assigns a specific strategy to each system. Some applications move as-is with minimal changes. Others need platform adjustments or deeper redesign. Certain systems get replaced with SaaS products. Legacy applications might be decommissioned entirely. Applications get ordered into migration waves that respect dependencies and manage risk. Prerequisite work like upgrades, refactoring, or network changes gets identified.
Estimating costs and risks calculates cloud resource needs using historical usage data. The analysis includes one-time costs for re-engineering work, new tools, training programs, and external support. It lists technical, regulatory, and organizational risks with potential mitigations for each. This financial picture supports budget requests and business case development.
Building the roadmap summarizes overall readiness level and major blockers or enablers. It describes the intended future landscape at a high level. The roadmap outlines a step-by-step migration plan with indicative timing and milestones. Execution teams use this deliverable as their reference document through implementation.
The table below summarizes the assessment phases, their key activities, and expected outcomes:
Phase | Key Activities | Deliverable |
Preparation and scoping | Formulate main questions, identify stakeholders from IT/business/security/finance, define scope boundaries | Scope document with assessment objectives |
Discovery and inventory | List applications/services/servers, collect architecture diagrams, use discovery tools for undocumented systems | Complete inventory of IT assets |
Assessment and analysis | Evaluate technical fit and complexity, assess business importance, check data sensitivity, review operational readiness | Application classifications by readiness level |
Choosing migration approaches | Assign strategy per system (move/redesign/replace), order into migration waves, identify prerequisite work | Migration approach matrix |
Estimating costs and risks | Calculate cloud resource needs, include one-time costs, list technical/regulatory/organizational risks | Financial projections and risk register |
Building the roadmap | Summarize readiness level, describe future landscape, outline step-by-step plan with timing | Migration roadmap with milestones |
Cloud readiness assessment checklist
Use this checklist to evaluate your organization's preparation for cloud migration. Each item should be reviewed and documented before proceeding with your transition.
Category | Assessment Item | What to Evaluate |
Business alignment | Migration objectives | Document specific goals: cost reduction targets, scalability requirements, innovation timeline |
Application criticality | Rate each system by business impact and acceptable downtime | |
Success metrics | Define measurable KPIs for migration success | |
Infrastructure | Current environment inventory | List all servers, storage systems, network equipment, and virtualization platforms |
Network bandwidth | Measure current usage and assess capacity for data transfer | |
Hardware compatibility | Identify systems that cannot move to cloud | |
Applications | Application dependencies | Map connections between systems, databases, APIs, and services |
Architecture patterns | Classify as monolithic, microservices, or legacy | |
Performance baselines | Document current response times, throughput, and resource usage | |
Technical debt | Identify outdated frameworks, unsupported platforms, code quality issues | |
Data | Data volume and growth | Calculate total data size and projected growth rates |
Data classification | Categorize by sensitivity: public, internal, confidential, restricted | |
Data residency requirements | Identify geographic or jurisdictional constraints | |
Backup and recovery needs | Define RPO (Recovery Point Objective) and RTO (Recovery Time Objective) | |
Security & compliance | Current security posture | Review firewalls, access controls, encryption, monitoring tools |
Regulatory requirements | List applicable regulations: GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, industry-specific standards | |
Identity and access management | Evaluate current IAM systems and cloud compatibility | |
Compliance gaps | Identify areas where current practices fall short of cloud requirements | |
Team & skills | Cloud expertise | Assess team experience with AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, or other platforms |
DevOps capabilities | Evaluate knowledge of CI/CD, Infrastructure as Code, containers | |
Training needs | Identify skill gaps and required certifications | |
Resource availability | Determine if internal teams can handle migration or external help is needed | |
Operations | Monitoring and logging | Review current tools and cloud migration compatibility |
Incident management | Document current processes and required adaptations | |
Change management | Assess organizational readiness for new workflows | |
Automation level | Measure current scripting vs Infrastructure as Code adoption | |
Costs | Current IT spending | Calculate total cost of ownership for on-premises infrastructure |
Cloud cost estimates | Project monthly and annual cloud expenses by workload | |
Hidden costs | Account for data transfer, storage, licensing, training, and support | |
Financial model | Compare CapEx vs OpEx and determine budget allocation | |
Risk assessment | Technical risks | List potential integration issues, performance problems, data loss scenarios |
Business risks | Identify downtime impact, customer experience issues, revenue effects | |
Mitigation strategies | Document contingency plans for each identified risk |
This checklist provides a systematic framework for your cloud readiness assessment. Review each item with relevant stakeholders and document findings to build your migration strategy.
Migration approaches for workloads
Cloud readiness assessment results determine which migration approach fits each workload.
Move with minimal changes (often called rehost or lift-and-shift) transfers applications to cloud infrastructure without significant modifications. Systems move quickly but capture limited cloud benefits. This works well for applications that run fine as-is and don't need immediate modernization.
Adjust platform or configuration (replatform) makes limited changes to take advantage of cloud features. You might switch databases to managed services or add auto-scaling. Speed gets balanced with benefit capture in this middle path.
Re-architect for cloud involves substantial redesign to use cloud-native patterns. Applications become more modular, resilient, and efficient. More time and resources get required but maximum long-term value gets delivered.
Replace with SaaS swaps custom applications for commercial software-as-a-service products. The maintenance burden gets eliminated entirely. This works when available SaaS products meet your needs adequately.
Retire unused systems removes applications that no longer serve business purposes. Assessment often reveals forgotten systems consuming resources without delivering value. Decommissioning frees budget and attention.
Keep on-premises temporarily delays migration for systems with special constraints. Technical limitations, regulatory requirements, or interdependencies might justify waiting. The assessment documents these cases clearly so they don't get forgotten.
Assessment results guide these choices by rating each application's cloud fit, business value, complexity, and risk. Guesswork gets replaced with informed decisions about which systems move when and how.
The table below summarizes migration approaches and their optimal use cases:
Migration Approach | When to Use |
Move with minimal changes (Rehost) | Applications run fine as-is and don't need immediate modernization. Quick migration needed with limited cloud benefits. |
Adjust platform (Replatform) | Want to capture some cloud features like managed databases or auto-scaling while balancing speed with benefits. |
Re-architect for cloud | Need maximum long-term value. Applications should become more modular, resilient, and efficient. More time and resources available. |
Replace with SaaS | Available SaaS products meet your needs adequately. Want to eliminate the maintenance burden entirely. |
Retire unused systems | Systems no longer serve business purposes. Consuming resources without delivering value. |
Keep on-premises temporarily | Technical limitations, regulatory requirements, or interdependencies justify waiting. Special constraints exist. |
Tools that support assessment
Several categories of tools accelerate cloud readiness assessment.
Inventory and discovery tools automatically collect information about servers, services, ports, and network traffic. They map communication flows between components. Manual effort gets reduced substantially and hidden or forgotten systems get surfaced. Automated discovery provides more complete and accurate data than interviews alone.
Application analysis tools scan code and configuration files for outdated frameworks, unsupported platforms, or security issues. They highlight modules that present greater migration difficulty. Manual review gets supplemented with objective measurements of application health and modernization requirements.
Cost estimation tools use actual resource usage data to size target cloud instances and services. They produce rough cost estimates for different deployment scenarios. While projections require adjustment based on detailed design, they provide useful ranges for budget planning and business case development.
Reporting and visualization tools present assessment results as tables, diagrams, and dependency maps. Good reporting makes findings accessible to both technical and non-technical audiences. Clear visuals help stakeholders understand complexity and make informed decisions about priorities and timing.
Surveys and workshop materials gather input from development, operations, security, and business teams. Structured questionnaires capture expectations, constraints, and perceived risks efficiently. Workshops complement automated discovery by adding context about how systems actually get used and maintained.
Most environments benefit from combining multiple tool types to build a complete picture. The right mix depends on environment size, available time, and team familiarity with assessment practices. Working with experienced cloud consulting services helps select appropriate tools and interpret results effectively.
What you get from the cloud readiness assessment

A thorough cloud readiness assessment produces several key deliverables.
Application portfolio with classifications catalogs each system with its business role, suggested migration approach, complexity rating, and risk level. The portfolio assigns priority in the migration sequence based on dependencies and value. Planning and execution reference this structured inventory.
High-level target architecture shows how applications and data could arrange in the cloud. It identifies shared services like networking, identity management, logging, and backup infrastructure. The architecture positions on-premises, hybrid, and multi-cloud elements where relevant. Detailed design work follows this blueprint.
Migration roadmap describes which applications move in each phase. It maps dependencies between steps and defines key checkpoints like pilot completion or environment validation. The phased plan includes indicative timing for each wave. Teams coordinate work and communicate progress to stakeholders using this timeline.
Operating model recommendations suggest changes in roles, responsibilities, and collaboration patterns. The assessment proposes initial rules for access control, resource tagging, monitoring practices, and cost management. Teams adapt to cloud-native ways of working through these operational guidelines.
Skills development plan identifies knowledge gaps in architecture, operations, security, and development practices. It recommends specific training programs, certification paths, or hiring needs. Some companies engage remote senior software engineers and dedicated development teams to supplement internal capabilities during transition periods.
Assessment findings transform into actionable guidance through these deliverables. Teams move from "should we migrate" to "here's exactly how we'll do it" with confidence grounded in data.
Common mistakes in cloud migration
Several patterns frequently undermine cloud migration efforts. The following table outlines common mistakes and practical prevention strategies:
Mistake | How to Prevent |
Seeing cloud only as new hosting | Review architecture and processes, not just infrastructure. Rethink how systems work, not just where they run. |
Insufficient attention to people and processes | Plan operational changes alongside technical ones. Avoid maintaining old deployment practices in new environments. |
Incomplete inventory and hidden dependencies | Use thorough discovery tools. Document all services, scripts, and integrations before migration. |
Late security and compliance involvement | Include legal and security experts from the beginning. Make them part of initial design decisions. |
Weak cost visibility and control | Establish clear ownership for cloud spending. Implement cloud cost estimation practices before migration starts. |
Attempting large "all at once" migration | Use an incremental migration approach. Learn from early phases and adjust methods based on experience. |
Best practices for your cloud readiness assessment
Effective cloud readiness assessments follow several principles:
Make goals and success criteria explicit. Write down what decisions the assessment should support and how you'll measure success. Align expectations between IT leaders, business stakeholders, and finance teams before work begins. Clarity prevents disagreements about scope and deliverables later.
Include all relevant functions from the start. Involve representatives from IT, security, compliance, finance, and business units in planning discussions. Agree upfront on how to rank applications and how to balance competing concerns about risk, cost, and value. Cross-functional input produces more realistic and acceptable outcomes.
Combine automated discovery with expert review. Use tools to gather factual data about systems and infrastructure. Validate and enrich findings through interviews and workshops with people who build and maintain the systems. Automation provides breadth while human insight adds necessary context.
Work iteratively. Start with a subset of systems or a pilot domain. Test assessment methods, scoring approaches, and prioritization frameworks on this limited scope. Adjust based on what you learn before expanding to the full environment. Quality improves and stakeholder confidence builds through this approach.
Connect assessment results to broader plans. Link findings to ongoing modernization efforts, product roadmaps, and organizational initiatives. Companies that treat cloud readiness assessment as a recurring activity rather than a one-time project maintain better alignment as environments evolve.
Conclusion

Cloud readiness assessment prepares companies for migration, but several factors need attention after the initial review. Data migration becomes more complex than anticipated. Moving large data volumes, converting formats, and validating results need separate planning from application moves.
Hybrid cloud fits when some workloads stay on-premises because of regulations, technical limits, or costs. The optimal setup often mixes cloud and on-premises infrastructure instead of moving everything.
Assessment can't be done once and forgotten. Environments change, applications get added, business needs shift. Regular reassessment keeps cloud strategy current with company direction. The first evaluation sets a baseline, ongoing reviews improve results.
Each company follows a different migration path. Regulations, legacy systems, team experience, and business goals vary widely. Standard frameworks give structure but real execution needs expertise matched to your specific setup.
Want to map your migration path? Partner with Streamlogic's cloud team to build an assessment tailored to your infrastructure, compliance requirements, and goals.

Halina Haydinger
Strategic Marketing Manager, Streamlogic
Tech Council
Consulting
Cloud readiness assessment: checklist and best practices
How to assess company readiness for cloud migration. Covers infrastructure evaluation, application analysis, costs, security, and team skills.

Halina Haydinger
Strategic Marketing Manager, Streamlogic
Nov 17, 2025



